Androcentric Rules in the Use of Address Term in Sasak Folklore

Authors

  • Titik Ceriyani Miswaty (1) Universitas Bumigora
  • Taufik Suadiyatno (2) Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
  • Sutarman Sutarman (3) Universitas Bumigora

Keywords:

androcentric rule, address term, Sasak Folklore, cultural value

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the application of androcentric rules in the usage of address terms in Sasaknese folklore. Folklore encompasses oral traditions, myths, legends, songs, dances, and rituals that are inherited from generation to generation. It often reflects the history, values, and worldview of a community, which provides insights into its cultural heritage. This research utilizes a descriptive qualitative approach in which the data used consists of language used in folklore. Ten elders are involved as expert triangulation in the storytelling process to ensure the reliability of the folklore. The result of this research provides evidence of deep-rooted androcentrism and it can be seen from the usage of address terms that are used in the data of this research. It also proves how the culture of society is reflected in its language and mirrored in its literary works.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brouwer, D., Gerritsen, M., & de Haan, D. (1979). Speech differences between women and men: On the wrong track? Language in Society, 8, 33–50.

Colman, A. M., et al. (1981). Preferences for Christian Names as a Function of their Experienced Familiarity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20(3-5).

Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge University Press.

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.

Fakihuddin, L. (1998). Citra Manusia dan Nilai-nilai Edukatif dalam Cerita Rakyat Sasak [Thesis, IKIP Malang, Program Pascasarjana, Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia].

Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices, and applications. Polity Press.

Jespersen, O. (1922). Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. George Allen & Unwin.

Keraf, G. (2007). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa: Edisi Revisi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Miller, M. M., & James, L. E. (2009). Is the generic pronoun he still comprehended as excluding women? The American Journal of Psychology, 122, 483-496.

Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn't mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 757-769.

Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. Rutgers University Press.

Vansina, J. (1985). Oral Tradition as History. The University of Wisconsin Press.

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1993). Power, inequality, and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological view. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender – feminism on theory (pp. 151–174). Aldine de Gruyter.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-08

How to Cite

Miswaty, T. C., Suadiyatno, T., & Sutarman, S. (2023). Androcentric Rules in the Use of Address Term in Sasak Folklore. Jurnal Sinestesia, 13(1), 610–616. Retrieved from https://sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/378

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.