Current Studies on Pragmatics Competence in EFL Learning Context: A Review

Authors

  • Bayu Andika Prasatyo (1) STBA Technocrat; Doctoral Student at Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia
  • Helena Verusha Ali (2) Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia
  • Dini Hidayati (3) Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi

Keywords:

pragmatic competence, EFL learning, pragmatic

Abstract

Pragmatic competence has hitherto been one of the concerns that has received attention in the area as a vital element of linguistic competence. This conceptual study showcases a brief overview of pragmatics competence in EFL learning environment by highlighting what study designs have been utilized in contemporary research that focuses on pragmatic competence in the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning and what the implications of fostering pragmatic competence are elaborated in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom under the realm of pragmatics study. The design of the study utilizes library research method. The present study presents a collection of empirical research examining pragmatic competence within English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning contexts. The research methodologies implemented in these studies mostly consist of descriptive qualitative techniques, mixed methods, with only a limited number of studies utilizing the quantitative approach. Furthermore, the impact of sociopragmatic competence is significant in enhancing the communication abilities of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allott, N. (2010). Key terms in pragmatics. Continuum.

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1989). The construct validation of self-ratings of communicative language ability. Language Testing, 6(1), 14–29.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2014). Awareness of Meaning of Conventional Expressions in Second-language Pragmatics. Language Awareness. 23(1-2), 41-56.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1?47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. Alcón Soler, & M.P. Safont Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 41–57).

Chen, J. (2021).A Review of Pragmatic Competence in BELF Interactions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n6p98

Deda, N. (2013). The role of pragmatics in English language teaching. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(14), 63-70.

Erlinda, R. (2019). Introduction to Pragmatics; Applying Research Based Learning Model. Prenada Media Grup.

George, M. W. (2008). The elements of library research: What every student needs to know. Princeton University Press.

Ibrahim, A., & Maniam, M. (2022). A Review Article of the Pragmatics-Based-Curriculum in EFL Context: Focus on the Curriculum in Iraq. Birle Journal. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.1035

Kasper, G. (1997). Introduction: Interlanguage Pragmatics in SLA. Studies of Second Language Acquisition. 18(2), 145-148.

Kentmen, H.; Debreli, E.; Yavuz, M.A.(2023). Assessing Tertiary Turkish EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence Regarding Speech Acts and Conversational Implicatures. Sustainability, 15, 3800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043800.

Moradi, S. et al. (2016). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), pp. 2175-2185. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0611.15

MIT Libraries. (2020). Database search tips: Boolean operators. https://libguides.mit.edu/c.php?g=175963&p=1158594

Pamugkas, N. A. R., Wulandari, L. T. (2020). Pragmatics in EFL Classroom: Avoiding Pragmatic Failure in Cross-Cultural Communication. J. Eng. Teach. Res., 5, 74–91.

Purpura, J. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge University Press.

Riheel Alnaas Taha, A, Hussain, S, Sajid Aziz, M, & Ali Raza, H. (2022). The EFL Students’ Pragmatic Competence Level in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics (SINOMICS JOURNAL), 1(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v1i2.14

Sari, R. D. P, Suwandi, S., & SLamet, S.Y.(2017). Factual and Existential Presuppositions in Interaction among Lecturers and Students of Indonesian Language Education Department at Universitas Sebelas Maret. Pusat Kajian Humaniora.16(2).

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman.

Wiseman, R. L. (2003). Intercultural communication competence. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication (pp. 191?208). Sage.

Wu, W. (2008). Misunderstandings of Communicative Language Teaching. Engl. Lang. Teach., 1, 50–53.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-28

How to Cite

Prasatyo, B. A., Ali, H. V., & Hidayati, D. (2023). Current Studies on Pragmatics Competence in EFL Learning Context: A Review. Jurnal Sinestesia, 13(2), 985–994. Retrieved from https://sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/429

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)