Flouting Maxim in Smile Movie: A Pragmatic Study
Keywords:
pragmatic, maxim of quantity, maxim of quality, maxim of relevance, maxim of mannerAbstract
The objective of this research is to identify the types of flouting maxim and the factors of flouting maxim in Smile Movie. In this study, a qualitative approach that was descriptive was employed. The dialogue in the film Smile serves as the research's data source. Grice's theory (1975) served as the theoretical foundation for this study. Thirty instances of infractions of Grice's maxims of cooperation principles were found as a consequence of this investigation. The maxim of number comprises 9 data (30%), the maxim of quality includes 9 data (30%), and the maxim of relevance includes 11 data (36.6%) out of the total 30 data. and the manner 1 data maxim (3.4%). The characters also carry out the following factors: 14 data (46.6%) that are competitive, 1 data (3.4%) that are convivial, 7 data (23.4%) that are collaborative, and 8 data (26.6%) that are conflictive. It is evident that, at 36.6%, relevance is the most frequently violated aspect by the characters, and competitiveness is the most frequently utilized component at 46.6%.
Downloads
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
Chandra Yuliasman. (2014). AN ANALYSIS OF FLOUTING MAXIM USED IN MONSTER UNIVERSITY MOVIE.
Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford University Press.
Cropley, A. J. (2021). Introduction to Qualitative Research Method: A practice-oriented introduction for students of psychology and education. University of Hamburg.
Cruse, A. (2006). A Glossary of Semantic and Pragmatic. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatic and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. Longman.
Farikha, I., & Nuzulia, L. (2020). Pragmatic Analysis of Flouting Maxim in Donald Trump’s Interview with TIME in the Oval Office 2020. 5(3), 333–347.
Fitri, E., & Qodriani, L. U. (2016). A Study on Flouting Maxims in Divergent Novel. 14(1), 32–40.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. Oxford University Press.
Griffith, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantic and Pragmatic. Edinburgh University Press.
Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (Second Edition). Oxford Press.
Hancock, B. (1998). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Trent Focus Group.
Holmes, J. (1992). An introducing to sociolinguistic. Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
Ibrahim, Z., Arifin, M. B., & Setyowati, R. (2018). The flouting of maxim in the Se7en movie script. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni dan Budaya, 2(1), 81-94.
Kroeger, R. P. (2018). Analyzing Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic and Pragmatics (Texbooks in Language Science 5). Language Science Press.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles in Pragmatics. Routledge.
Marlisa, R. (2020). The analysis of flouting maxim in Good Morning America (GMA) talkshow. 7(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v7i2.6630
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics. An Introduction (2nd Ed). Routledge.
Nuzulia, I. F. L. (2020). Pragmatic analysis of flouting maxim in Donald Trump’s interview with TIME in the Oval Office 2020. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(3), 333-347.
Sari, Y. W., & Afriana, A. (2020). The cooperative principle analysis in About Time movie. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 4(1), 66-76.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Simatupang, E. C. M. (2021). Pragmatic Analysis of Deixis in The Novel Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell. Widyatama University. English Journal Literacy Utama.
Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
Thomas, J. (2013). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Routledge.
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints, and Apologies. Mouton de Gruyter.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rima Desrifianti, Ervina C M Simatupang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
