Linguistic Landscape in the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid Pasuruan City: Language Studies in Public Spaces with a Multimodal – Qualitative

Authors

  • Badriyah Wulandari (1) Universitas PGRI Wiranegara
  • Tristan Rokhmawan (2) Universitas PGRI Wiranegara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53696/27219283.185

Keywords:

landscape linguistics, multimodal, language forms, language functions, language meaning, religious tourism

Abstract

Language has a very important role in tourist destinations, including religious tourism destinations, the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City. As part of the language used in public spaces, the language used in this tourist destination is interesting to study in terms of form, function, meaning, and value. In this regard, this research is an attempt to describe the form, function, meaning, and value contained in the language used in the tourist destination. This research was conducted qualitatively using a landscape linguistic (LL) and multimodal approach. Sources of data are the languages found on signboards in public spaces in religious tourism destinations of the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City. Research data were collected by shooting using a digital camera and smartphone camera and analyzed using a multimodal approach with semantic, semiotic, and language metafunction theories that were used as benchmarks in describing forms, functions, meanings, and cultural values. Based on the data analysis, the findings of this study can be categorized into four groups. First, the forms of language used in the religious tourism destinations of the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City. Second, the function of language in religious tourism destinations, KH Abdul Hamid's Tomb, Pasuruan City. Third, the meaning contained in the languages used in religious tourism destinations, the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City. Fourth, cultural values in the languages used in religious tourism destinations, the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aribowo, E. K., Nugroho, A. J. S., & Rahmat. (2018). Ancangan Analisis Bahasa di Ruang Publik: Studi Lanskap Linguistik Kota Surakarta dalam Mempertahankan Tiga Identitas. Semiloka Dan Deklarasi Pengutamaan Bahasa Negara, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/qa5p8

Barker, C. (2000). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. Sage Publications Ltd.

Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic Landscape as Symbolic Construction of the Public Space: The Case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383

Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177

Blommaert, J. (2012). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes. In Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes (Issue April). ultilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419

Chaer, A., & Liliana Muliastuti. (2012). Makna dan Semantik. Semantik Bahasa Indonesia, 5, 1–39. http://repository.ut.ac.id/4770/1/PBIN4215-M1.pdf

Kostanski, L. (2009). “What’s in a name?”: place and toponymic attachment, identity and dependence: a case study of the Grampians (Gariwerd) National Park name restoration process. In Dissertation (Issue March).

Kress, G. and V. L. (1996). Reading Images The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge?: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Kusik, V. (2015). Onomastical analysis of inscriptions from Koper and its vicinty. Studia Universitatis Hereditati, 3(2), 69–98.

Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002

Marten, H. F. (2010). Linguistic landscape under strict state language policy: Reversing the soviet legacy in a regional centre in Latvia. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-009

Puzey, G. (2016). The Conceptualization and Expanding Gaze of The Linguistic Landscape. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (Issue 1, p. 396). Oxford University Press.

Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (2008). Linguistic Landscape Expanding the Scenery (Issue 1).

Sibarani, R. (2015). Pendekatan Antropolinguistik Terhadap Kajian Tradisi Lisan. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 1(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.1.1.105.1-17

Sloboda, M., Szabó-Gilinger, E., Vigers, D., & Šimi?i?, L. (2010). Carrying out a language policy change: Advocacy coalitions and the management of linguistic landscape. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2010.505067

Spolsky, B. & R. L. C. (1991). The Languages of Jerusalem.:The Languages of Jerusalem. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1994.4.1.107

Spradley, J. P. (1997). Metode Etnografi. In Research Gate. Tiara Wacana. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323557072

Sunarti, S. W. R., & Hakim, L. (2017). Penerapan Sapta Pesona pada Desa Wisata (Analisis Persepsi Wisatawan atas Layanan Penyedia Jasa di Kampung Wisata Kungkuk, Desa Punten, Kota Batu). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 50(2), 195–202.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-22

How to Cite

Wulandari, B., & Rokhmawan, T. (2022). Linguistic Landscape in the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid Pasuruan City: Language Studies in Public Spaces with a Multimodal – Qualitative. Jurnal Sinestesia, 12(2), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.53696/27219283.185

Issue

Section

Articles