Linguistic Landscape in the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid Pasuruan City: Language Studies in Public Spaces with a Multimodal – Qualitative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27219283.185Keywords:
landscape linguistics, multimodal, language forms, language functions, language meaning, religious tourismAbstract
Language has a very important role in tourist destinations, including religious tourism destinations, the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City. As part of the language used in public spaces, the language used in this tourist destination is interesting to study in terms of form, function, meaning, and value. In this regard, this research is an attempt to describe the form, function, meaning, and value contained in the language used in the tourist destination. This research was conducted qualitatively using a landscape linguistic (LL) and multimodal approach. Sources of data are the languages found on signboards in public spaces in religious tourism destinations of the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City. Research data were collected by shooting using a digital camera and smartphone camera and analyzed using a multimodal approach with semantic, semiotic, and language metafunction theories that were used as benchmarks in describing forms, functions, meanings, and cultural values. Based on the data analysis, the findings of this study can be categorized into four groups. First, the forms of language used in the religious tourism destinations of the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City. Second, the function of language in religious tourism destinations, KH Abdul Hamid's Tomb, Pasuruan City. Third, the meaning contained in the languages used in religious tourism destinations, the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City. Fourth, cultural values in the languages used in religious tourism destinations, the Tomb of KH Abdul Hamid, Pasuruan City.
Downloads
References
Aribowo, E. K., Nugroho, A. J. S., & Rahmat. (2018). Ancangan Analisis Bahasa di Ruang Publik: Studi Lanskap Linguistik Kota Surakarta dalam Mempertahankan Tiga Identitas. Semiloka Dan Deklarasi Pengutamaan Bahasa Negara, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/qa5p8
Barker, C. (2000). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. Sage Publications Ltd.
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic Landscape as Symbolic Construction of the Public Space: The Case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177
Blommaert, J. (2012). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes. In Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes (Issue April). ultilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419
Chaer, A., & Liliana Muliastuti. (2012). Makna dan Semantik. Semantik Bahasa Indonesia, 5, 1–39. http://repository.ut.ac.id/4770/1/PBIN4215-M1.pdf
Kostanski, L. (2009). “What’s in a name?”: place and toponymic attachment, identity and dependence: a case study of the Grampians (Gariwerd) National Park name restoration process. In Dissertation (Issue March).
Kress, G. and V. L. (1996). Reading Images The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge?: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Kusik, V. (2015). Onomastical analysis of inscriptions from Koper and its vicinty. Studia Universitatis Hereditati, 3(2), 69–98.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
Marten, H. F. (2010). Linguistic landscape under strict state language policy: Reversing the soviet legacy in a regional centre in Latvia. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-009
Puzey, G. (2016). The Conceptualization and Expanding Gaze of The Linguistic Landscape. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (Issue 1, p. 396). Oxford University Press.
Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (2008). Linguistic Landscape Expanding the Scenery (Issue 1).
Sibarani, R. (2015). Pendekatan Antropolinguistik Terhadap Kajian Tradisi Lisan. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 1(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.1.1.105.1-17
Sloboda, M., Szabó-Gilinger, E., Vigers, D., & Šimi?i?, L. (2010). Carrying out a language policy change: Advocacy coalitions and the management of linguistic landscape. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2010.505067
Spolsky, B. & R. L. C. (1991). The Languages of Jerusalem.:The Languages of Jerusalem. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1994.4.1.107
Spradley, J. P. (1997). Metode Etnografi. In Research Gate. Tiara Wacana. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323557072
Sunarti, S. W. R., & Hakim, L. (2017). Penerapan Sapta Pesona pada Desa Wisata (Analisis Persepsi Wisatawan atas Layanan Penyedia Jasa di Kampung Wisata Kungkuk, Desa Punten, Kota Batu). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 50(2), 195–202.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Badriyah Wulandari, Tristan Rokhmawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
